Editorial: Using Object instead of constructor in PromiseResolve

[d01c2]

The argument C of the abstract operation PromiseResolve has type of Constructor in current spec. However, as following example, it allows an object as C and throws an error 42 in 1.a. I think the type of C should be an Object, not a constructor.

var C = {}
var x = new Promise(function () {});
Object.defineProperty(x, 'constructor', { get: () => { throw 42; }});
Promise.resolve.call(C, x);

[jmdyck]

Looks correct to me.

(I was thinking that maybe PromiseResolve is right to require that _C_ be a constructor, and instead, Promise.resolve should do more strict checking before it invokes PromiseResolve, but that would be a change of behavior for your example.)