Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve pane transitions in bank auth flow #8682

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tillh-stripe
Copy link
Collaborator

@tillh-stripe tillh-stripe commented Jun 25, 2024

Summary

This pull request adds proper pane slide transitions in the bank auth flow, and a fade effect for the Stripe logo in the top bar.

We exclude the attach-payment screen from the slide transitions, as it would just cause a slide from one loading indicator to another (we use a fade instead).

(cc @malecks-stripe)

Motivation

Testing

  • Added tests
  • Modified tests
  • Manually verified

Screen recordings

Before

before.mp4

After

after.mp4

Changelog

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Diffuse output:

OLD: identity-example-release-base.apk (signature: V1, V2)
NEW: identity-example-release-pr.apk (signature: V1, V2)

          │            compressed            │           uncompressed           
          ├─────────────┬─────────────┬──────┼─────────────┬─────────────┬──────
 APK      │ old         │ new         │ diff │ old         │ new         │ diff 
──────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────
      dex │       2 MiB │       2 MiB │  0 B │     4.2 MiB │     4.2 MiB │  0 B 
     arsc │ 1,023.8 KiB │ 1,023.8 KiB │  0 B │ 1,023.7 KiB │ 1,023.7 KiB │  0 B 
 manifest │     2.3 KiB │     2.3 KiB │  0 B │       8 KiB │       8 KiB │  0 B 
      res │   301.5 KiB │   301.5 KiB │  0 B │     455 KiB │     455 KiB │  0 B 
   native │     6.2 MiB │     6.2 MiB │  0 B │    15.8 MiB │    15.8 MiB │  0 B 
    asset │     6.7 KiB │     6.7 KiB │  0 B │     6.5 KiB │     6.5 KiB │  0 B 
    other │    85.5 KiB │    85.5 KiB │ -8 B │   158.7 KiB │   158.7 KiB │  0 B 
──────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────
    total │     9.6 MiB │     9.6 MiB │ -8 B │    21.6 MiB │    21.6 MiB │  0 B 

 DEX     │ old   │ new   │ diff      
─────────┼───────┼───────┼───────────
   files │     1 │     1 │ 0         
 strings │ 21305 │ 21305 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
   types │  6770 │  6770 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 classes │  5559 │  5559 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 methods │ 31121 │ 31121 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
  fields │ 18141 │ 18141 │ 0 (+0 -0) 

 ARSC    │ old  │ new  │ diff 
─────────┼──────┼──────┼──────
 configs │  164 │  164 │  0   
 entries │ 3392 │ 3392 │  0
APK
   compressed    │   uncompressed   │                        
──────────┬──────┼───────────┬──────┤                        
 size     │ diff │ size      │ diff │ path                   
──────────┼──────┼───────────┼──────┼────────────────────────
 28.3 KiB │ -9 B │  62.6 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/CERT.SF     
 25.1 KiB │ +2 B │  62.5 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 
  1.2 KiB │ -1 B │   1.2 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/CERT.RSA    
──────────┼──────┼───────────┼──────┼────────────────────────
 54.6 KiB │ -8 B │ 126.3 KiB │  0 B │ (total)

@malecks-stripe
Copy link

Looking good! I noticed in the 'after' that the bank logos load simultaneously, vs. the 'before' where a few logos loaded first and then the rest loaded afterward. Is that a change related to this PR? Or just happened to be the case during the recording?

@tillh-stripe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@malecks-stripe That’s likely because of caching from the previous run. We kick off the request for all bank logos at the same time, so any delays would be random.

Comment on lines +90 to +91
private val NavBackStackEntry.skipTransition: Boolean
get() = destination.pane == ATTACH_LINKED_PAYMENT_ACCOUNT
Copy link
Collaborator

@carlosmuvi-stripe carlosmuvi-stripe Jul 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lmk what you think, but I prefer being more declarative with checks like this by just adding a new field on the Destination class. Happy to be convinced otherwise!

@tillh-stripe tillh-stripe marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2024 13:32
@tillh-stripe tillh-stripe requested review from a team as code owners July 3, 2024 13:32
@tillh-stripe tillh-stripe requested review from carlosmuvi-stripe and removed request for a team July 3, 2024 13:32
Base automatically changed from tillh/fc-better-success-animation to master July 3, 2024 13:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@carlosmuvi-stripe carlosmuvi-stripe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This definitely improves the current experience!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants