Use debug info for func args #1183
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The current way we extract function names from arguments in LLVM is rarely successful. This is because the names attached to the LLVM Argument objects are empty, likely removed during the compilation process. This adds an option for looking at debug information to spot the right argument name. Ref: #1175 Signed-off-by: David Korczynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Korczynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Korczynski <[email protected]>
AdamKorcz
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current way we extract function names from arguments in LLVM is
rarely successful. This is because the names attached to the LLVM
Argument objects are empty, likely removed during the compilation
process. This adds an option for looking at debug information to spot
the right argument name.
Ref: #1175