Support for ECDSA with hashing #683
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Aims to fix opendnssec#620.
Aims to fix opendnssec#620.
|
Hello @MatthiasValvekens, |
|
Sure, I sorta gave up on it at the time since I didn't get any response (and didn't want to invest too much time only for the PR to never get merged in the end), but absolutely feel free to build upon what I did! |
|
Neet ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I had a go at #620, since it'd be useful for one of my projects, in which I use SoftHSM as a testing backend for PKCS#11 code.
The PR is very much a work in progress: it does what I want with both the OpenSSL backend and the Botan one, but I'd like to get an extra pair of eyes before I start adding validation logic & tests.
Thanks!