Update Rust crate tower to 0.5.0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tower	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.4.13 -> 0.5.0

---

Release Notes

tower-rs/tower (tower)

v0.5.0: tower 0.5.0

Compare Source

Fixed

• util: BoxService is now Sync (#​702)

Changed

• util: Removed deprecated ServiceExt::ready_and method and ReadyAnd
  future (#​652)
• retry: Breaking Change retry::Policy::retry now accepts &mut Req and &mut Res instead of the previous mutable versions. This
  increases the flexibility of the retry policy. To update, update your method signature to include mut for both parameters. (#​584)
• retry: Breaking Change Change Policy to accept &mut self (#​681)
• retry: Add generic backoff utilities (#​685)
• retry: Add Budget trait. This allows end-users to implement their own budget and bucket implementations. (#​703)
• reconnect: Breaking Change Remove unused generic parameter from Reconnect::new (#​755)
• ready-cache: Allow iteration over ready services (#​700)
• discover: Implement Clone for Change (#​701)
• util: Add a BoxCloneServiceLayer (#​708)
• rng: use a simpler random 2-sampler (#​716)
• filter: Derive Clone for AsyncFilterLayer (#​731)
• general: Update IndexMap (#​741)
• MSRV: Increase MSRV to 1.63.0 (#​741)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[renovate]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --workspace
error: failed to parse manifest at `/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/Cargo.toml`

Caused by:
  the cargo feature `edition2024` requires a nightly version of Cargo, but this is the `stable` channel
  See https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/appendix-07-nightly-rust.html for more information about Rust release channels.
  See https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/unstable.html#edition-2024 for more information about using this feature.

[TimDiekmann]

Related issue: tower-rs/tower#784

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 17.72%. Comparing base (0de48a6) to head (db0e01d).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4866      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   17.72%   17.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         504      504              
  Lines       16516    16522       +6     
  Branches     2539     2540       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         2928     2928              
- Misses      13550    13556       +6     
  Partials       38       38              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.18% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	48.46% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.79% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$74.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$85.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 769 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.578 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$1.55 \mathrm{s} \pm 3.38 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.94 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.40 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph