feat(product_enablement) - Add support for Fastly Bot Management.

[BrooksCunningham]

This PR adds the ability to enable Fastly Bot Management via the product_enablement field in a fastly_service_vcl resource. Below is an example with bot_management enabled.

product_enablement {
    bot_management = true
    origin_inspector = true
    domain_inspector = true
  }

I have successfully tested locally and updated the test file fastly/block_fastly_service_product_enablement_test.go to have the field bot_management = false.

Please let me know if there are any other tests that I may run or updates that I may make to help get this PR merged. Thanks!

[BrooksCunningham]

@kpfleming Now that this PR (fastly/go-fastly#539) has been merged, are there are additional steps required before this PR may be merged?

[kpfleming]

I believe the answer is:

1. Update this line to reflect that v9.9.0 is required.
2. Revert the local changes to the vendored copy of go-fastly.
3. Run 'go mod vendor' to update the vendored copy to be v9.9.0.

[BrooksCunningham]

@kpfleming I reverted my changes to the vendor file [vendor/github.com/fastly/go-fastly/v9/fastly/product_enablement.go]. However, now the tests are failing.

How may I pass the tests without modifying the product_enablement.go file directly?

[Integralist]

Your last commit 22a07f2 seems to revert the changes made by go mod vendor

[BrooksCunningham]

Your last commit 22a07f2 seems to revert the changes made by go mod vendor

@Integralist Correct. Should I not do that? Or should I run go mod vendor and commit the changes made from that command? That command will modify product_enablement.go

[Integralist]

That's correct, run go mod vendor and the files generated you'll keep committed.

e.g. you'll see /vendor is committed as part of the repo https://github.com/fastly/terraform-provider-fastly/tree/main/vendor

[BrooksCunningham]

@Integralist @kpfleming Done. Let me know if I need to make any further modifications. Thanks for the guidance!

[Integralist]

@kpfleming you'll probably want to run the complete e2e tests as I don't think @BrooksCunningham will have the relevant access to do that.

[kpfleming]

@kpfleming you'll probably want to run the complete e2e tests as I don't think @BrooksCunningham will have the relevant access to do that.

Yep. We'll also need to get that product enabled on the SID we use for those tests.

[kpfleming]

Acceptance tests for this feature pass as planned.