Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolve #1738 | Add jetty http client request processing time metrics #1756

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SkySurferOne
Copy link

No description provided.

@SkySurferOne SkySurferOne force-pushed the 1738-improve-monitoring-http-serial-client branch from fbbfbea to 3f777ff Compare October 18, 2023 16:19
@SkySurferOne
Copy link
Author

SkySurferOne commented Oct 19, 2023

Not sure if tests are flaky or my code broke them. I'd be grateful for some guidance. Also please let me know if you want a test for that metrics are reported when they are turn on.

szczygiel-m
szczygiel-m previously approved these changes Oct 19, 2023
@faderskd
Copy link
Contributor

faderskd commented Oct 19, 2023

@SkySurferOne I know I told you that we want these metrics for serial client, but I realised that batch JettyMessageBatchSender uses the same type of client. Can we add these metrics to the batch too ? It would be nice to have consistent set of metrics :)

@faderskd
Copy link
Contributor

When it comes to the failed test, these are flaky ones, we will fix them in a few weeks. By the time I'll rerun them until passed

@SkySurferOne SkySurferOne force-pushed the 1738-improve-monitoring-http-serial-client branch from 244782e to 8eca2b2 Compare October 19, 2023 15:44
faderskd
faderskd previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
@SkySurferOne SkySurferOne marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2023 08:05
szczygiel-m
szczygiel-m previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants