Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Judgements are not standardized in osu!mania wiki articles #8188

Closed
Ephemeralis opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Judgements are not standardized in osu!mania wiki articles #8188

Ephemeralis opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Ephemeralis
Copy link
Member

Ephemeralis commented Oct 11, 2022

As per this message from the osu!dev server and repeated for posterity below:

At some point within the next couple of weeks, the osu!mania wiki articles need to standardise judgements.

In osu!lazer we use Perfect/Great/Good/Ok/Meh/Miss. These are fairly well defined in https://github.com/ppy/osu/wiki/Scoring#hit-results.
In other places we currently have a mix of things. "Rainbow 300", "300g", "MAX", and even "Marvelous" are used. "Marvelous" is particularly egregious since it implies a "perfect" scoring value that isn't the same as our Perfect and is more equivalent to "300"(/Great). These are referenced interchangeably in many places:
- https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/en/Gameplay/Judgement/osu%21mania "Rainbow 300", "MAX", and "Marvelous" (in reference to equivalency). Also refers to "Not Good" judgements which is just WTF.
- https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/en/Guides/osu%21mania_Mapping_Guide "300g"
- https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/en/Gameplay/Game_modifier/Hard_Rock "MAX"
- https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/en/Gameplay/Judgement/Geki "MAX"
Etc...

On top of that, osu-web lists "MAX".

In particular, "Marvelous" cannot exist. "MAX" and "300g" (perhaps just "MAX") can be mentioned by way of a "commonly referred to as"```
@smoogipoo
Copy link
Contributor

#8189

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants