Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modular repositories #112

Open
ppisar opened this issue Feb 15, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Modular repositories #112

ppisar opened this issue Feb 15, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@ppisar
Copy link

ppisar commented Feb 15, 2023

Fedora puts modular packages into dedicated repositories. An example for Rawhide https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Modular/. https://mdapi.fedoraproject.org/branches does not list them. Could you add them? Please be ware that modular repositories can contain packages in multiple versions. Hence https://mdapi.fedoraproject.org/rawhide/pkg/perl-libs-like query should report more than one package.

@gridhead
Copy link
Member

I would run through the infrastructure team to better understand if we should implement this feature before we go ahead with making it happen. Give me some time to get back to you on this.

@dralley
Copy link
Contributor

dralley commented Aug 6, 2023

@ppisar given the recent decisions to drop modularity from fedora, is this still desired?

@ppisar
Copy link
Author

ppisar commented Aug 7, 2023

The decision removes modularity from Fedora ≥ 39 repositories. If mdapi service only targets that Fedoras, then this request is not valid any longer.

@dralley
Copy link
Contributor

dralley commented Aug 7, 2023

If mdapi service only targets that Fedoras, then this request is not valid any longer.

Well it seems to go back to at least Fedora 28, though I don't know for which branches it is absolutely required. I assume any non-EOL branches.

My question is more along the lines of, the support has never existed since modularity was introduced and there doesn't seem to be any obvious issues resulting from that, and the utility will only decrease from here on, so would it even be worth spending time on this?

@ppisar
Copy link
Author

ppisar commented Aug 7, 2023

I don't think there is anybody ho desperately needs this implementation for Fedora 37 or 38. So my opinion is that it does not make sense to start working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants