Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JuMP.jl vs OptimalControl.jl #306

Open
ocots opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

JuMP.jl vs OptimalControl.jl #306

ocots opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@PierreMartinon @jbcaillau @ocots
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ocots
Copy link
Member

ocots commented Aug 20, 2024

We should add in the tutorial, a very simple comparison of JuMP.jl and OptimalControl.jl. In terms of modelisation and resolution with the time and using @benchmark.

Which problem(s) do we choose? One or two, not more.
@ocots ocots added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 20, 2024
@ocots
Copy link
Member Author

ocots commented Aug 24, 2024 •
edited by jbcaillau
Loading

We can show some examples with InfiniteOpt.jl and Casadi also.

@jbcaillau
Copy link
Member

@ocots yes. as discussed yesterday I suggest to split things into:

  • comparison of modelers for optimal control (vs. finite dim optim) control problems (such as InfiniteOpt.jl); check https://github.com/orgs/control-toolbox/discussions/26
  • optim benchmark after discretisation (comparison with JuMP et al), using benchmark frameworks develop by the optimisation community

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@PierreMartinon PierreMartinon

@jbcaillau jbcaillau

@ocots ocots

Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@PierreMartinon @jbcaillau @ocots